Friday, February 28, 2020

Khruschev Was Right



My next column in The Everett Herald:
Notwithstanding Truthless Trump’s hypo-inspiring, politicized news conference, which left investors unconvinced, the fawning of HHS Secretary Azar, and Trump's previous firing of President Obama's pandemic response team, COVID-19 is less worrisome long-term (so far) than firing his Director of National Intelligence. So let’s talk about that, instead.  
In perhaps the most prescient prediction from any world leader, ever, Nikita Khrushchev famously said: “We do not have to invade the United States, we will destroy you from within.” If details were scant, Vladimir Putin has filled in the blanks, and it’s working beyond his most vodka-suffused dreams. That firing is the latest proof. 
Theories abound as to how he glommed onto Trump, whether he turned him or saw him as the proverbial useful idiot. Doesn’t really matter. Putin understands American politics better than most Americans. Trump, he realized, was Khrushchev’s perfect pathogen.  
Completing much of President Putin’s agenda, Trump removed sanctions imposed by President Barack Obama, has weakened NATO and the EU, handed the Middle East to him, gotten Japan and South Korea at each other’s throats, got rolled by Putin’s protégé Kim Jong Un. Climate change denial, too: oil is Russia’s main export, and Putin runs the company. 
But that’s just frosting on the borscht. Putin’s overarching intent is helping the US descend into political chaos, to distrust its own institutions, to see fellow citizens as enemies. To self-destruct. In Trump, he saw the means. Throughout his career, Donald has all but announced it; whether he’s consciously in on it is immaterial. 
A former KGB interrogator and, one assumes, a bolshoi judge of character, Comrade Putin recognized Trump’s weaknesses; narcissism, looseness with the truth, uninformed and incurious, his history so littered with illegal, incompetent, and mob-like behavior that Putin knew exactly what he’d get if he managed to help Trump through the door. Which, denials notwithstanding, he did. Three years into a “presidency,” he’s gotten his rubles’ worth.  
Trump hates the public knowing what President Putin was up to. Which is why he fired acting DNI Maguire for telling the truth about Russia’s help; truth being an unwelcome commodity in Trump’s reign. His replacement is someone wholly inexperienced in intelligence matters, but whose loyalty to Trump was confirmed by his prior nasty online presence, shady associations (which ought to disqualify him from security clearance), and pro-Trump trolling. 
The message is unmistakable: intelligence agencies work only for Trump. Those who disagree, who believe in protecting America and not just Trump are “deep state traitors.” (By contrast, when told of Russian intentions to push his candidacy – no mystery why -- Bernie Sanders denounced Putin, not the messenger.)  
We needn’t translate Cyrillic to know what’s in President Putin’s playbook: hoped-for Trump activities, beside which are checked boxes; in addition to the aforementioned, there’s attacking journalists as “enemies of the people,” saying Democrats “want to destroy you,” (he blamed Monday’s market crash on Tuesday’s Democratic debate), calling honorable public servants “scum,” undermining fair elections and, by appointing unqualified ideologues and attacking decent judges and jurors, destroying faith in our courts. 
As Trump’s supporters venerate his demagoguery and shout down anyone who disagrees, President Putin, grinning in the Kremlin, toasts his way through another round of blini and beluga.  
We’ve been this divided before. Back then, though, there were huge issues separating us: slavery, Vietnam. Now, it’s one person acting deliberately, fear-mongering, prevaricating, fomenting hate of “the other” and distrust in institutions, in order to use his office for vendettas and personal enrichment. 
We’ve never had a “president” who systematically attacked every governing principle that could protect us from him gaining unlimited power. We’ve never seen people working to protect democracy dismissed as unjustified haters. We’ve never had a “president” who so perfectly fulfills the wishes of enemies who seek our failure, and who squelches Americans pushing back and exposing it.  
Trump denies and hides Russia’s manipulations of our self-destruction. Trumpists do, too, obediently, despite the unanimity of our and international intelligence services, and digital footprints online and in voting machines. And now, aided by Mrs. Justice Thomas, Trump is undertaking a Soviet-style purge of people throughout our government deemed “disloyal,” by which is meant anyone who has or might speak up against him.  
If foreign interference in our elections is insignificant and hasn’t helped Trump and Republicans, why has that party become a serial killer of Democratic bills aimed at preventing it? And why is Trump firing those who are conscientiously warning us about it? Isn’t it obvious?    
[Image source]

13 comments:

  1. My money is on 'useful idiot'. What of substance worth turning could there possibly be in Trump? With just a few gentle strokes of Trump's gigantic ego Putin certainly must have found orange putty in his hands. I imagine Putin being so deliriously happy with his luck and skill at shaping our moronarchy that he sometimes has trouble falling asleep at night.

    "... serial killer of Democratic bills aimed at preventing ..." I think that's a metaphor that would resonate with voters, Sid.

    Sadly, your fine piece will be met with silence tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Khrushchev’s perfect pathogen"

    Memories light the corners of my mind
    Misty water-colored memories of the way we were
    Scattered pictures of the smiles we left behind
    Smiles we gave to one another for the way we were
    Can it be that it was all so simple then
    Or has time rewritten every line
    If we had the chance to do it all again
    Tell me, would we?
    Could we?
    Memories may be beautiful and yet
    What's too painful to remember
    We simply choose to forget
    So it's the laughter we will remember
    Whenever we remember
    The way we were
    The way we were

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvp68ZjXLGw

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've always been of the thought that Drumpf is more afraid of Putin than he is of the US Government.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good Column Dr. Schwab.
    Maybe just my confirmation bias at work here. It is good to hear from someone who is as pissed off as many of us are. Find it so obvious that Putin and the leadership in Russia are on track with their long schemes to become a world power again. If their economy cannot stand up to us, they must make use of the fools-- and boy did they pick a perfect puppet in trump, and his bunch of enablers-- anything for power, the ultimate corrupter.

    Humor is hard to come up with lately, the trolls do get tiresome, think the Herald handled it well. I have tried for years to have civil discussions on different sites and usually does become grossly uncivil-- and I can go there too.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Highlander here! Different handle, same "banner".

    > Theories abound as to how [Putin] glommed onto Trump, whether he turned him or saw him as the proverbial useful idiot. Doesn’t really matter.

    My vote's definitely for "useful idiot". Trump doesn't play well enough with others to be any kind of co-conspirator or double agent, which rules out the "Putin turned him" theory. For all practical purposes, though, what really matters is the current state of affairs and what to do about it: Vote not-Trump in 2020.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nice to see some of TEH regulars showing up here. Wonder if Sid can set up threaded comments so as to get two way conversations going?

    As to der Furor, I suspect he's on Putin's hook for two reasons:

    1) He owes the Russian thugocracy more than his actual net worth, thus they OWN him

    2) He wants, more than ANYTHING, to be regarded as a "made man" amongst the world's authoritarian dictator set. Thus all his sucking up to the likes Putin, Xi, Kim, Erdogan, et al ad nauseam.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It is hard to keep up with the news, as Trump's ignorance of the most basic facts are so defeating. It is also upsetting to see some of the ways the systems have gone on for the splashy and forgotten many basics.

    Have noticed that many of the opinion columns have removed the comments sections---starve the trolls. It does send them to their lairs for now. Many years ago I belonged to a Classmates 2001 discussion board and it was brutal. So this is not new.

    Thanks for the columns though, it is good to partake of sanity from time to time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @unknown...

    The reason for the comments sections disappearing and any comment ever in the history of opinion columns. All past comments wholly eliminated.

    There are trolls everywhere. Comments sections are taylormade for trolls.

    I am of the opinion they (the higher ups) want to control everything said. Boeing would pay money to shut down comments. Drumpf would pay money as well. The cops would probably like the comments gone. Politicians of all persuasions as well.

    It's all about controlling the narrative. Anytime your job relies on interviewing people and fact finding in general, it's hard to be impartial. If their advertising dollars are keeping you in circulation, you listen to the advertiser.

    Simply put...

    The news is a business like any other. I think we can all agree if we had a business, we'd want total control, or as much as humanly possible anyway.

    Boeing doesn't want a shred of bad publicity in any form. They want that free money back and they'll get it too. Why? Money buys power and influence. There's two sets of rules.

    The election is right around the corner and *POOF* go the comments like a blackout of the power grid. If it's anything like 2016, the DCCC is going to steal the election from Bernie again. They'd prefer to do it in the dark.

    You think anyone tells Jeff Bezos what to write in his paper??? The Post dumped the Everett rag and many others in WA. when Bezos took over. Why? Because it's a business. Because he wants to tightly control the message.

    We are getting Bezos and sound publishing news. MSNBC has bared their fangs at Bernie after super tues.(wed. morning) In 2016 they flat ignored him. Then claimed in hindsight "they missed the wagon" when Hillary lost. I am speaking specifically about Joe and Mika "morning joe".

    Controlling the narrative is #1b...#1a is turn a profit.

    Yes, it (comments) was a cesspool. Kicking out Harry 904 and ks would have gone a long long way to making the comments viable. Yet? They allowed them to troll day after day for years. Print Russian propaganda. Agitate and antagonize commentators. Threaten and intimidate commentators. Print people's personal information..and on and on and on...They did nothing to stop it. Not a thing. It was all very crystal clear. Both the offenses and the punishment. The only thing missing was enforcement. It went on for years. So I have a hard time believing that they erased all history because current day comments are a cesspool. They didn't do it last time they shut down comments.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Smooth, where do you suppose they got "personal" information?

    Maybe using your real name was a problem. I did talk to the Herald about that, and they said that they wished everyone used their real name.

    Not sure that just shutting it down and erasing all the messages is what happened, they must be on disqus ?sp? Anyway, stay well.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Found this in my box today.
    I didn't use my real name...Did I? I'm pretty sure I didn't. I imagine there's dozens of ways to identify someone. I'm not that smart or ambitious. I've always thought that people who do stuff like that have something seriously wrong with them. It's a comment section. I don't take it that seriously. Everyone has something to say.

    https://www.ted.com/talks/chuck_plunkett_when_local_news_dies_so_does_democracy?utm_source=newsletter_daily&utm_campaign=daily&utm_medium=email&utm_content=image__2020-03-06

    ReplyDelete
  11. > [StO said]: The news is a business like any other. I think we can all agree if we had a business, we'd want total control, or as much as humanly possible anyway.

    I'd say the "bu$ine$$" angle was definitely at play in the demise of the comments. The spaces at the bottom of the story pages are now stuffed with links (and their associated images), about half of which are of the "sponsored ad" persuasion.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I did use my name on TEH, so was concerned, plus I am female, which adds to the troll bait, or has in the past.

    ReplyDelete
  13. > Not sure that just shutting it down and erasing all the messages is what happened, they must be on disqus?

    They are. You can go into disqus.com, sign in using your Disqus username and password, and see your comments and your notifications (of upvotes and replies).

    You can also see entire discussion threads. Click on either the timestamp on your comment ("x days ago") or the line saying how many comments there are on the story. That will bring up the entire discussion thread. There are also links to the stories, but in the case of TEH, you won't be able to get the comments and the stories in the same window. You can also do this by going onto another site that uses Disqus as a comment platform.

    TEH didn't erase anything. The way I suspect it works is there is some sort of widget they were putting on story pages where they wanted to show comments (remember, they had the option of not showing comments). So my guess is that all they have done is changed to not putting that widget on any pages, instead of only putting it on selected pages.

    ReplyDelete

Comments back, moderated. Preference given for those who stay on topic.

Popular posts