Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Clowns To The Right Of Me

 


In fairness, no one could have seen it coming. No reasons to predict that appointing, to oversee Earth’s most powerful military, an alcohol-abusing, inexperienced, unqualified, sexually profligate (allegedly), threateningly-tattooed, weekend talk-show host on a network known for its troubled relationship with truth would be problematic. After all, America put into even higher office a convicted felon, sexual predator, and bankrupted businessman who got there by lying, cheating, threatening, and/or suing everyone in his way. Who, as promised, ended the Ukraine war on day one and cured inflation. 

No clues. No warnings for fifty members of a party once self-reported as partial to law and order and meritocracy to have voted against confirmation in hopes of being presented with someone only half-terrible. Plus, there’s the matter of consistency: the same slack-back body approved someone to run America’s most powerful law-enforcement agency who’d shown fawning deference to that failed businessman by refusing to prosecute him for one of his many life-destroying scams. And accepted donations in return.

Nor did they have the self-respect to refuse to put in charge of America’s health a brain-bitten, conspiracy-believing, steroid-pumping man with no background in healthcare other than promoting vaccine choices that led to dozens of deaths in Samoa, who couldn’t differentiate a credible scientific study from the morning line on a horse race.

Same with a director of the FBI who conspiratorially disparaged the agency, believing fantasies, who spends more time away from the office than in it, posing for pictures. And yet another picture-poser, playing pistol-packin’ dress-up, in charge of Homeland Security, who had her purse containing $3,000, her passport, driver’s license, and DHS ID badge stolen from under her nose. Plus another TV star and pusher of quackery in charge of administering Medicare and Medicaid. All approved with obsequious rapidity by “the world’s greatest deliberative body.”

Alaska’s Senator Lisa Murkowski, whose mother’s relationship to my surgical practice HIPAA prefers I don’t detail (nor shall I discuss my surgical relationship with former Senator Dianne Feinstein’s family), bravely – and why should it require bravery? – voted against some, but not all, of those incompetents. She has since stated the obvious: that colleagues in her party are afraid of Trump; too concerned about primaries and power, future and fortune, to consider their duty to country. Which is exactly how Trump wants them. Exactly how dictators bulldoze and bully bodies theoretically empowered to hold them in check.

But, hey: if good people are being fired from the Pentagon, at least military cadets will no longer be reading Maya Angelou in their libraries, or around 800 other books containing scary words and liberal ideas ripped straight from the Sermon on the Mount. It’s unclear if the words of General Stanley McChrystal, who commanded operations in Afghanistan under Trump, are available in military academies, but, speaking of congressional cowardice, they’re worth hearing:

"When our leaders abandon character ... it tells people that principles are optional, that decency is weakness, that rules are for fools. It fosters a culture of fear, where hesitation replaces confidence, cynicism replaces trust, and self-preservation replaces the courage to stand for what is right. When those at the top abandon the standards that hold society together, the rest of us, knowingly or not, follow suit. And when enough people do, the foundation doesn’t just erode. It crumbles. We cannot afford to let this stand."

The General’s words describe exactly where we are. They apply not only to Republicans in power but to every remaining supporter of Trump. The sort that considers Maryland Senator Chris van Hollen a traitor for calling attention to the dangers of abandoning the rule of law, even for criminals or alleged criminals. The sort who no longer have the ability to tell right from wrong, truth from fiction; who, by following suit, are actively hacking at the foundations of society. Knowingly or not.

Seeing SecDef’s disastrous mismanagement and its deleterious effects in the Pentagon, one might wonder if any of the senators who voted for him have come to regret it. The question answers itself: of course not. Had they the inborn ability and insight to rethink decisions, to hold themselves accountable for their mistakes, they’d not have voted for him in the first place. Every day, they reveal themselves to be the opposite.

So, as others have said, a clown was placed in office and the circus came to town. Talk show hosts talking trash. Lib-stickers in lipstick. An “economist” who quotes himself in made-up names. An Education Secretary into the A1 sauce. A “border czar” who brags about flouting the law. There’s no one to blame but everyone who put them there. 

Finally: Pope Francis was a good, kind man whose life, unlike that of the fake Christians surrounding the fakest of them all, fully embodied the teachings of Jesus. And, therefore, not a MAGA favorite.

He’ll live on in the acts of goodness he performed and in the hearts of those who cherish his memory.




10 comments:

  1. 100%. My wife and I banter about what it will take for Congressional Rethuglicans to finally FINALLY decide that Yambo has gone too far and will assert their legislative authority. In both of our scenarios, it involves the placement of the military either in the streets to support martial law or in combat with a former ally. In either case, the question is how far the military will go before they too decide the Emperor has no clothes and must be disobeyed. GAWD... how far we have fallen in such a short time, but some of us knew it would be this bad or worse. We weren't wrong, but that's cold comfort.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The military takes the same oath the Mad King takes. But only one actually takes it seriously.

      We can't follow illegal orders. None of us. US military is civilian run and owned. This isn't Nam anymore. You can't just send troops and expect the civilian people to stand down. They will not. As we are seeing.

      That's why all these MAGA cops are in dark clothes with no real markings other than the ICE, DEA etc. on their backs. Unmarked vehicles and disappear people. If nothing else? It's article 136.

      Ain't no leader gonna touch that.

      Delete
    2. We hope and believe you're right, but the force for them to follow Yambo's orders will be strong. If the military rejects him, it will be ON.

      Delete
  2. They are terrified officially. We learned from 2016. They gonna get what they got comin'. Just like the Nazis? The fossils and old timey politics are ovah. We are going to use our power to use loopholes too.

    As of now, however, the DNC does not have the power to remove Hogg if he refuses to stand down on funding primary challenges through a separate PAC — unless the body changes its rules, a senior DNC official told NBC News.

    “Under the present bylaws, there is no action that can be taken against David Hogg without changing to the bylaws to extend that policy of neutrality to all primaries," DNC Finance Chair Chris Korge told NBC News. "There is no codified, legal way to remove an officer for doing what David Hogg has done because it only extends to the presidential race. "

    Korge said that, as of now, the situation is to be addressed at a future meeting, likely in August.

    Korge said he believed it was imperative for the body to formally change its bylaws because the party division the Hogg situation has caused harkens to an old ghost Democrats don't want to revisit.

    “It smells like 2016, when progressives said the DNC had it in the bag for Hillary Clinton," Korge said, referencing angst in the party that the DNC had its thumb on the scale to block Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., from the presidential nomination. "No party official, no officer of the DNC, should do anything that would result in the division that was created by the perception that existed back in 2016."

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/david-hogg-disrupts-democratic-party-rcna202202

    ReplyDelete
  3. I just watched The Two Popes. Highly recommend it. I didn't understand most of the other languages. But the English speaking was plenty to keep my 100% attention which is nearly impossible for me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Although 'Conclave' was an excellent film, I highly recommend watching 1968's 'The Shoes of the Fisherman' to see the future foretold. That film could not be any more prescient or relevant to where we are as a society today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I mentioned "The Two Popes" specifically because it was about Francis and the last Pope. The German dude. I will watch the fisherman one. I got it written down here. I'll give you my revue.

      Delete
    2. I watched Conclave finally. Good movie. A couple twists. Interesting. It kept my attention for most of it.

      Delete
  5. Can anyone listening logically explain why Santos gets the book tossed at him. And "Yam-bo" doesn't?

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/former-rep-george-santos-sentenced-7-years-prison-rcna202397

    ReplyDelete
  6. Here's some Bernie. We are doing very well. We got everyone nervous.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBgl7n10CS0

    ReplyDelete

Comments back, moderated. Preference given for those who stay on topic.

Popular posts