Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Fears For Tears

My latest newspaper column:
I keep trying to write something other than rants about Republican politics, but I can’t. It’s simply too important to point out the dangers of their science denial, their attacks on public education, their clinging to destructive economic policy, their preference for war and fear-mongering, rejection of compromise, desire for theocracy. Abandoning any claim to understanding democracy, much less supporting it, that party has turned to presidential candidates who prefer totalitarian bluster and lies to democracy and truth. Actual conservatism, all but dead now, had ideas that kept a toe grounded in reality; and they recognized our history. Who, for example, would argue for government bigger than it needs to be? Who, for another, would deny that our Constitution was founded on compromise, presumes public civility, and rejects the idea of oligarchy? 
But in their reflexive reactions to everything our president says or doesn’t say, does or doesn’t do, today’s right-wingers have left that all behind. I keep thinking, as yet another line is crossed, that their followers would have enough of it. That at some point followers of Fox “news” and the other conspiracy mongers of the airways would say, okay, that’s beyond the pale. Like they did, say, with the Dixie Chicks and their comparatively mild rebuke of that other president. 
Consider those right-wing screamers’ reactions to President Obama’s announcement that he’ll be strengthening enforcement of existing gun laws. You know, the thing they’ve always demanded in response to calls for more laws: enforce the ones we have. Except when Barack Hussein Obama says it; then, it’s tyrannical tyranny by a tyrannizing tyrant. And when his plans include spending on mental health care, because, as the NRA tells us, mass murders are about that, not guns, it’s economic wastefulness. And now, despite demanding it for years, they’re even angry at how hostages in Iran got released. In their view, unless we get everything we want by dint of bombs and blood, we’re weak. Losers. Yes, say their followers. It’s only war and braggadocio that make us great. 
About those gun-related executive orders, Charles Krauthammer opined “Obama’s not asleep at the wheel, he’s not at the wheel at all.” Good one, right? But consider this: the man he’s derided as a despotic dictator, when he acknowledges there’s only so much he can do without Congress, is criticized, with a straight face, by Dr K for staying within the law. Alex Jones, of course, saw it differently: the president’s actions will lead to rounding up gun owners and putting them in camps the way Nazis did Jews. Yes, he said it. No doubt his followers believe it, because that’s what passes for policy disagreement nowadays. Even moralistic Rand Paul has turned to Jones for advice. Simply amazing. 
That’s just the sideshow, though, predictable as voting to repeal Obamacare without offering alternatives. The real tell is in their claims that President Obama faked tears as he spoke of children who’ve died from gun violence. Because in their universe, only fetus-Americans deserve tears. Outside the womb, the young are on their own. Empathy and concern for children, deep enough to bring tears to a president who’s had to meet repeatedly with the families of murdered kids, can only be fake. No matter how much you disagree with President Obama, who can defend that level of mendacity and hatefulness? If it’s not enough to make Foxophiles change the channel, what is? 
What does it say about their view of voters that candidates think the path to credibility consists in saying to the president, as Chris Christie did, “We’re gonna kick your butt out of the White House.” Marco Rubio says he bought a gun for protection against ISIS. Does a majority of Republicans think that way? Is that what’s required to win conservatives’ votes nowadays? If so, what hope is there? If not, why their silence? 
Here’s a thought: imagine rational people hearing the words President Obama spoke in his final State of the Union address without knowing the speaker. Which would they find consistent with a person who, as the screamers claim, hates America, who’s deliberately made us weak? At what point will today’s Republicans demand respectful dialogue from their preferred leaders?  
[Image source]


  1. I wouldn't apologize for focusing on Tpub platform issues. Charles K-Hammer does nothing but prop up the Tpubs.

    Bernie is going to win and inherit Obamas political void. The House and Senate can continue to throw a fit because they have the numbers. Bernie ain't gonna compromise the lefts positions on issues like climate change and Citizens United/Wall Street/Banks etc. Hilary might have, but she ain't gonna be POTUS.

    Some 'experts' claim Hilary has the lions share of black and Hispanic votes. I think once Bernie gets their attention, that will shift. Then when Bernie is the nominee, he'll get all of those votes and will win going away.

    Now imagine a world with Trump running as an independent. Trump is holding the Tpubs hostage. The Dems. really really really want Trump to win the nomination.

    The left will occupy the White House. The left will get to pick the new SCOTUS Judge. Maybe 2-3 Judges if the left gets 8 years. I think the SCOTUS will be stacked with liberal Judges after what we have seen. America can not be allowed to be held hostage again by Ted Cruz or any other radical faction of government. Using the peoples full faith and credit as a bargaining chip was never a serious consideration until the right made it so. Government can not be so easily bought. Something has to change and only the left will fix it. The right wants to double down on their failed 'trickle down' economics.

    The right has so damaged the party brand that they won't recover for at least a generation. I could easily see 30-40 years w/o a right leaning POTUS in the White House.

    Yeah, we all need to focus on what is as stake and not apologize for shedding light on the rights platform of greed, racism and plain ol' perversion of the Constitution in general.

    The British won't let Trump on their shores!

  2. I'm a little less sanguine about Bernie than you are, Smoothie. I agree with pretty much everything he says; but I wish he'd tone it down some, and frame it a little less "us against them." Because, in the end, the "millionaires and billionaires" need to pitch in, and it'd be best if they did it willingly, or even sort of grudgingly. I think there's a way to make them, and the big corporations get on board as opposed to demonizing them.

    Hillary doesn't inspire me much. I'd happily vote for either of them over any of the Rs; but either way it's a big come-down from Barack Obama.

  3. "Hillary doesn't inspire me much."

    She inspires nobody I am aware of. What if it turns out Hillary is nothing more than a crap samich with name recognition? Hillary was the most qualified, recognized, safe bet last time. "Fired up ready to go" kicked her ass and Obama became the beloved POTUS with the mostest. The Secretary of cool. Bo and Sunnys' alfa dog.

    If Bernie wins Iowa and NH it's on. America has shown it is willing to take chances.

    So do we all agree Elizabeth Warren is the next VP?

  4. I take Ms Warren at her word that she's not interested. Not in running for pres, and, therefore, veep even less so. But who knows?

  5. Well, I am stepping out on that limb already. So I figured I'd go all the way out there. All 2 of the candidates visited with her before they declared. I didn't hear about anyone elses ring getting kissed. A French kiss of course, because we are leftist radicals.

    At least there's some really interesting possibilities as opposed to an anointed veep as well.

    I just think that anyone can beat Cruz or Trump in the general. Thus making Bernies "not a safe bet" ball and chain almost completely irrelevant.

    I'll vote for whomever the left tosses in the ring. I am pretty sure we can all get on board with that.


Comments back, moderated. Preference given for those who stay on topic.

Popular posts