Wednesday, November 9, 2022

The Calling Of Surgery


Despite being mostly pleased, I find myself uninterested in commenting on Tuesday’s elections. Maybe next week. So here’s something corny I wrote, years ago, for an obscure medical publication: 


Being a surgeon, having the lives of fellow humans literally in your hands, is intimacy that only surgeons can fully grasp; it never stopped stopping my breath, never dulled me to its privilege. I never stopped saying to others in the operating room, “Look, at this. Isn’t it beautiful?”

How do you explain enveloping a living liver in your hand, its firm, slippery smoothness; or the pleasure of sewing bowel segments together in a way passed down by pioneering surgeons, laying it back in place, knowing no one else will see or appreciate the – dare I say -- artistry of it?

I was taught by great and generous surgeons. I learned well. But I never considered myself special: Electricians learn, too. Lawyers. Teachers. The difference, perhaps, is intensity. And immediacy: dozens of big and small decisions need making during an operation, instantly; there are no hiding places in the OR.

Receiving that trust is a daunting honor. As I wrote in my memoir of surgical residency, “A surgeon can kill you, and you’d sleep right through it.” I should have said “An inadequately trained surgeon.” Surgical residency gets bad press: too hard; cruel, even. But, at least in my long-ago time, it inculcated the most fundamental requirements of a surgeon: knowing your limits and accepting responsibility. Doctors who don't know when they’re in over their head are dangerous. Ones who avoid responsibility for outcomes aren’t to be trusted.

My career straddled very different eras. In training, the easy rotations were those in which I spent all days and every other night in the hospital; on the rest, it was twelve days and nights out of fourteen. Entering San Francisco General Hospital as Chief Resident on the trauma service, I didn’t leave for sixty days. I won't argue it was sensible (actually, I might), but I came out well-trained, comprehensively experienced, tempered by fire. Now, with working hour restrictions (based on a mischaracterized incident in NYC), it’s less true. Feeling unready, graduates increasingly seek subspecialty fellowships. More and more, we general surgeons are relics of times past.

I finished residency committed to being there for my patients, always. In my practice I made hospital rounds at least twice daily, more for the sick ones; whether on or off call, I felt better seeing my post-ops every day. My mentors wouldn’t have accepted anything less. Looking back, was it an overblown sense of irreplaceability, that no one could care for my patients as well as I? Whatever it was, I felt bad if I didn’t. And yet, when I retired, people did fine.

So I burned out. This era of reduced hours isn't all bad. I imagine newly-trained surgeons aren't as likely to bail out early. The pleasures of surgery remain: the marvels of the human body, knowing its anatomical secrets, the nooks and crannies, the hidden spaces into which you're allowed entry, knowing what to do. It’s still a binary world, though: you succeed (mostly) or you fail (sometimes). But the exhaustion? Maybe not so much. These days, surgeons might have a life, as they did during training.

Many hospitals now have both medical and surgical hospitalists, 24/7. Calls from the emergency department, the bane of my existence, no longer interrupt schedules of office-based surgeons, or their sleep. The hospital-based have predictable work hours and freedom from much of the administrative hassles that drove me nuts.

After retiring, I spent several months as the first and only surgical hospitalist in town, working ten-hour days (sometimes more) five days a week. Other than the lack of long-term connection to my patients, I liked it. Later, I spent several relatively stress-free years assisting on complex cancer operations, able to continue to be useful, yet sleep through the night.

In many ways, a general surgeon is like a family doctor who can operate. I'd argue there's no specialty that demands the same breadth of knowledge and range of skills. Surgery encompasses the pleasure of accomplishment and, occasionally, a heart-rending feeling of failure; the ability to do much good while balancing on the scalpel-edge of the potential for harm. I felt it every time I entered the OR, or left it to talk to waiting families, with good news or bad. I felt it in every office consultation where I tried to instill hope and confidence, to allay fears, to map a path from where we were to where we wanted to be.

Connecting. Able to help. That was always the best part.

9 comments:

  1. Corny — adjective; mawkishly old-fashioned : tiresomely simple and sentimental

    To thee, but not to me. Thank you for the enjoyable read, Sid, and for the links to your old blog. Good medicine for a grandparent anticipating Monday's strabismus surgery to correct his little grandson's vision.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My wife had that surgery as a child. Worked out well. He'll be fine. But thoughts and stares.

      Delete
    2. Thank you. Our daughter had also informed us that an ophthalmologist had said that the procedure is routine nowadays.

      Something else that comes to mind, from a book on evolution that I read, is a statement similar to, "There were no stone-age hunters who would have needed glasses." Our grandson may very well pass on the responsible gene(s), assuming the condition wasn't due to some other factor.

      Delete
    3. Thanks again, Sid. He's doing great.

      Delete
  2. I knew, and deeply respected, the last surgeon in L.A. to make house calls. His name was Gogol, Dr. Gogol; I never forgot him, because of his quiet, professional demeanor and his kindly interest not only in my mother's medical problem, but my education. After he diagnosed mom's need for surgery, which he allowed me to observe, he took time to sit down and talk to me, asking me about what I liked to read, my activities, and my interests, particularly in science and history. He later sent me a book on medical history and discovery. He was like you Sid, an example of a good and caring man. That's why I've kept up with your writing on this blog, for years now! Keep it up.
    EugeneInSanDiego

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Always great to hear from you, Eugene. I made house calls frequently, early in my career. As I got really busy, I did it less often; mainly for post op checks on people who had a very hard time coming to the office. I always learned something from seeing where and how they lived.

      Delete
  3. finally, figured out how to comment...I backed into general surgery, the last core rotation of my 3rd year in medical school. The decision turned out to be easy. The general surgical residents had the most fun and had the most unpretentious attitudes of any licensed physicians I encountered to that point. Then, I backed my way into the sub-specialty I ended up practicing, but never let go of the general surgery piece; referrals to the practice, assisting colleagues, cases out of the ER, referrals in from the hinterlands, inter-hospital transfers of surgical disasters. I worked like a slave at times, but it was FUN, and an amazing privilege to understand how health and disease played out from the inside-out. While it was good, it was awesome, wouldn't trade the experience for anything in the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What subspecialty did you back into?

      Delete
    2. Burn Surgery; major burn care has everything one could want in hospital based practice. The multidisciplinary program could manage literally anything in the way of critical illness and alot of disease processes beyond the bounds of burn injuries.

      Delete

Comments back, moderated. Preference given for those who stay on topic.

Popular posts