Monday, October 8, 2012
Why It's Important
This is exactly the argument for Obama and against Romney. Sadly, because of outright lies by Mitt Romney and somnolence by President Obama, it wasn't evident in the first debate. But it's still the truth, the distilled essence of what the election is about. RWS™ would prefer that you think it's about who's a Muslim Nazi Kenyan, or about death panels, or a secret plan to take your guns away. Because, on the truth, they lose.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular posts
-
Nothing can be said about last week’s presidential debate (debacle, more like) that hasn’t already been. So I will. Trump lied with every ... -
The assassination attempt and reactions to it are deeply depressing, foretelling a grim future. The most disgusting responses from politic... -
I’m trying to measure this feeling of hope and enthusiasm against the reality that it’s an uphill battle for a woman to become president; ... -
I t’s over. No thinking person will vote for Trump now. The catastrophe is out of the bagman. How? At a gathering of oil executives at Mar-a... -
In a country gone nuts, providing facts is as effective as bailing a boat with a salad fork. Nevertheless, patriotism and decades of doctori...
EICOTUS has achieved one thang with his Altitude corrected D-bate performance...
ReplyDeleteShut up the discussion on this blog, seriously, it's like tryin to find a Penn State "Nitily Lions" fan...
Frank "Obnoxious at any Altitude" Drackman
It's true, Frank: between deleting some of your comments, and having identified others that go directly to spam before I see them, it's sometimes lonely in the comment section. On the other hand, visitors continue to increase, I get emails, and am content with the content.
ReplyDeleteGuess with one notable exception, my readers wait till they have something useful to add; and since I cover the topics so brilliantly, among the already well informed, there's no need for redundancy.
There's something wrong with the mission of considering it a "duty to continually restate the obvious", and then continually posting Franks (or continually restating)obvious and obnoxious comments- which is more redundancy... I suppose, of which there's no need. Wasn't it Twain that said something about arguing with stupid people?
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteTrust me, I've been deleting about 2/3 of Frank's comments lately. Why not 100%?
There's another saying, from med school days: "Dyspareunia is better than no pareunia."
Didn't Yogi Berra say that?
ReplyDeleteNo Frank, if you are referring to the Dyspareunia comment, that would be Jerry Sandusky.
ReplyDeleteSid,
ReplyDeleteThis little old lady loves reading your blog. I rarely comment on any blog, but, tonight, I was inspired by Cory's comments.
Who is this Frank Drackman jerk and why do you put up with his ridiculous comments?
Thanks for listening.
Judy
Thanks for reading!
ReplyDelete