Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular posts
-
Nothing can be said about last week’s presidential debate (debacle, more like) that hasn’t already been. So I will. Trump lied with every ... -
The assassination attempt and reactions to it are deeply depressing, foretelling a grim future. The most disgusting responses from politic... -
I’m trying to measure this feeling of hope and enthusiasm against the reality that it’s an uphill battle for a woman to become president; ... -
Well, that was disappointing. Since I’ve been wrong about the essential goodness of the American people, I can only hope I’m also wrong ab... -
I t’s over. No thinking person will vote for Trump now. The catastrophe is out of the bagman. How? At a gathering of oil executives at Mar-a...
"... the world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable bylaws of business. The world is a business, Mr. Beale. It has been since man crawled out of the slime. ... one vast and ecumenical holding company for whom all men will work to serve a common profit ..."
ReplyDeleteRelax. Corporations and their CEOs have our best interests at heart. They're the best of the best, right? Our best hope? Well, The Atlantic April issue has a very brief article summarizing some research about CEOs. Don't we already know that taller people make better CEOs?? But did you know:
"As ceo compensation at the country’s top firms has surged—up nearly 1,000 percent in the past 35 years, blowing past economic growth—so too has a line of research dedicated to the rites and customs of the average corner-office occupant.
He—and it is almost always a he; the S&P 1500 includes fewer companies led by women than by men named John—looks unusually competent, even if he isn’t [1]. The odds that he holds an M.B.A. are about 50 percent, up from 10 percent in the mid-20th century (when CEOs were more likely to have a graduate degree in fields like law and engineering) [2]. He stands to earn more if he has a deep voice [3], impressive contacts [4], a large signature [5], or a superior golf game [6].
Speaking of golf: Though spending time on the green may be good for a CEO’s paycheck, some studies warn that it may not be so good for his company. Golf skills have been negatively associated with stock returns, as has personal use of a corporate jet (which correlates with membership in faraway golf clubs) [7]. Then again, even professional achievement can backfire on shareholders: Stock prices also tend to drop after a CEO wins a prestigious award—perhaps because such awards often bring with them distractions like book contracts and seats on outside boards [8].
Financial rewards, too, might have an adverse effect on CEO performance. One working paper found that firms led by highly compensated executives fared worse in terms of future stock prices than did similar firms offering more modest compensation. Larger paychecks weren’t associated with better work, the researchers found, but instead with inflated self-confidence and risky investments [9]. Other studies suggest that compensating a CEO with stock options—which become more valuable as a stock’s price rises, but don’t cost him anything if the stock’s price falls—increases the likelihood of product recalls [10] and shareholder lawsuits [11].
Fortunately, even corporate bosses have to answer to people outside the company. Married CEOs tend to have lower appetites for risk than single ones, and produce less volatile returns for investors [12]. And firms with higher levels of media scrutiny make more-altruistic decisions—suggesting that CEOs, like the rest of us, behave better when others are watching [13]."
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/ceos-behaving-badly/471513/