Wednesday, May 25, 2022

Saint Ronald And The Death Of Democracy



Other than Trump’s election lies, America’s most damaging, anti-democracy presidential utterance exited the face of Ronald Reagan on the occasion of his inauguration: "Government is not the solution to our problem; government IS the problem,” said he, thus igniting the incremental incineration of democracy that’s inflamed our country ever since.

But WE are the government. We choose it, we empower it, we -- when we’re dutiful -- direct and limit it. If government is the problem, therefore, the problem is us

JFK spoke, intimately, inspiringly, at my very small college only a month before his assassination. But one might question his inaugural admonition, “Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.” Because “doing for us” is what democracies are about. What we can do for our country is to put competent people in charge who are committed to good governance; rather than Trumpiloids, committed to big donors, big lies, and power for its own sake.

LBJ wanted his “Great Society” to promote “the desire for beauty and the hunger for community … a place where men are more concerned with the quality of their goals than the quantity of their goods… [T]he Great Society is … a challenge constantly renewed, beckoning us toward a destiny where the meaning of our lives matches the products of our labor.” That’s the “do for you.” Later, in a graduation speech, he defined “do for your country.” “Will you join in the battle,” he asked, “to give every citizen the full equality which God enjoins and the law requires, whatever his belief, or race, or the color of his skin? Will you join in the battle to give every citizen an escape from the crushing weight of poverty?” How unlike Reagan!

Therein is the immutable difference between Democrats and today’s Republicans. Democratic presidents and Congresses have aimed to help all Americans, while Republicans, echoing Saint Ronnie, have worked to keep it from happening. Convincing the convincible that a government that’s “here to help” is their enemy, they claim social programs create laziness, that regulations choke capitalism. Why? Because they cost money, which means higher taxes and safety constraints on their donors. So, instead of Democrats’ vision of government serving its people, we get Reaganite Republicans serving only the wealthy. And themselves.

We get Trump, whose “renegotiating” NAFTA was a major factor in the current baby formula shortage. We get 192 Republicans voting against a solution because they’d rather see babies go hungry than help President Biden fix it.  

We get every Republican voting against a bill cracking down on gasoline price-gouging, in order to hurt Biden (and us) and help their fossil-fuelers enrich themselves. Fifteen years ago, when a barrel of crude cost seventy-five dollars higher than it is now, gas cost about $1.50 less per gallon. But gouge away, say Republicans. You keep the donations coming and we’ll keep blaming Biden. (Fact: prices are higher in many other countries. President Biden’s fault, too?)

We get this year’s CPAC meeting in Hungary, home of Trumpists’ second-favorite tyrant, whose list of speakers featured hate-fomenting liar Tucker Carlson and a Hungarian journalist who’d called Jews “stinking excrement,” Gypsies “animals,” and Blacks even worse. And, completing the trifecta, Trump. It’s now who they are, and, through indifference by some voters and intent by others, that’s what we get.

We get a Republican party determined to reject healthcare for all Americans, spiking Democratic proposals while offering none. A party committed to creating distrust in our electoral system by perpetuating transparent lies about fraud, to justify disenfranchising voters most likely to vote against them; wanting to hand presidential choices to their state legislatures rather than voters. A party to blame for the anti-science beliefs, conspiracy theories, and distrust, as well as incompetent and inattentive management, that led to hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths from Covid-19.

We get Mitch McConnell’s 6-3 “pro-life” SCOTUS, ready to ban abortion, simultaneously ruling that innocence isn’t enough to keep a state from executing someone. 

We’ve gotten a party that chooses an evolution-denying, “Trump never said the election was stolen,” domestic-abusing, self-described mentally ill, unintelligible football player and a clueless coach as Senators, as long as they’ll beat qualified, honorable Democrats; and which is itching to remake America as a puritanical Christian theocracy. 

Whether or not it’d have prevented any of America’s almost daily, heartbreaking massacres, we get fifty, backboneless senators afraid of even the most minimal gun control legislation. Whose stars are still scheduled to speak at a NRA convention in Houston. But we do get thoughts and prayers.  

And, because enough people believed Reagan, we got January 6, too.

4 comments:

  1. You made several excellent points that I hadn't considered, thank you, regarding NAFTA, as an example. This has been a week, to say the least. Stay well all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have never understood how "small government" folks justify their thinking. How can something that is growing larger and more complex need less supervision and regulation? I mean, just bringing that concept into my personal reality, is the fact that after my younger sister was born (in 1956) and we moved from a two-bedroom house in Seattle to our four-bedroom house in Everett, my Maternal Grandmother came to live with us. Mom and Dad needed more help. We kids needed more supervision. Our little kingdom needed a Hand of the Queen/ King. Fellow fans of Game of Thrones will get that reference.

    Similarly, when schools got too crowded, what happened? More teachers were hired, and portables placed on campus. When things get larger, they get more cumbersome and need more supervision and control. So, I don't get how people think a country of 330 million people can need less supervision and fewer rules. It's nonsense.

    Recently my baby sister who spent many years working in Government--first for the estimable Eddie Boland--correctly pinpointed out as Sid has done here, that we started swirling the drain with Uncle Ronnie. The brilliant Heather Cox Richardson (you should all be reading her daily "letter from an American"), a professor of history at Boston College laid out the same idea. Rich, white folks were unhappy about having their tidy little nest eggs and livelihoods tapped to help support this sprawling country, hated the programs meant to support the least of us, blamed it on a variety of things like 'welfare queens' and 'inner city dwellers'. To that end, they have been systematically attacking the supportive underpinnings of the country for decades.

    I remember asking my Dad once if it made him angry to pay taxes supporting public schools even though we hadn't attended them until high school. His answer was a shocked "No"! Those other kids weren't lucky enough (his words) to go to private Catholic school (which was much, much, much cheaper then!) but they should still have the highest possible quality of education. That stuck with me, and informs my stance on a lot of things.

    I don't know how to end this Sunday morning thought stream so I'll just leave it here! Stay dry. Pray for my dahlia tubers, which I fear may be drowned and rotted. First world problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, but I know I've become one of "those people" who just talk about olden days. Next thing you know I'll be that woman on the street corner with a dowager's hump and a cigarette hanging out of her mouth, yelling at the passersby.

      Delete

Comments back, moderated. Preference given for those who stay on topic.

Popular posts