Coverup

Just as the RWS™ are saying -- and a commenter here, too -- there's been no investigation of what happened in Benghazi, and it's all being covered up:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday received an official review of the September attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, setting the stage for testimony on an incident that prompted a political furor and sharp questions about security at U.S. diplomatic facilities overseas. 

... "The ARB has completed its work. Its report has gone to the secretary this morning. She now has it,"State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said. 

The committee has been meeting in private and State Department officials have declined to discuss almost all specifics of the Benghazi attack pending its reports. The findings are expected to cover questions on whether enough attention was given to potential threats and how Washington responded to security requests from U.S. diplomats in Libya.

What is wrong with these people, the ones whose default assumption is that our duly elected president is working against us all? Well, we know about the RWS™, intent on inflaming the public to get eyes and ears, and, then, lots and lots of money. It doesn't hurt that the ones who aren't just sociopathic cynics are certifiably insane. But what about their listeners? What about people like the commenter here, who sees terrifying conspiracy everywhere she looks? What would it take to convince her -- and millions like her -- that they're been played, deliberately? Is it even possible? What is it about these people that makes them need to believe such things?

I wish I knew. For now, we just have to accept that human beings, the purported best of their claimed creator's work-product, are simply too flawed, too poorly designed to handle, or even want, truth. Ironic, on several levels.

[And, since we're talking denial of reality, people who still want to believe Fox "news" is fair and balanced should read this.]

[Image source]