It's finally become clear why Rs are okay with the idea of Mitt "You-Name-It-I'll-Say-It" Romney as president (and, by inference, why they began to worry about Newt): They're expecting to take control of both houses of Congress come December, and all they want from Romney is what exactly what they think he is: a president who'll sit meekly and do what Congress tells him:
They have reconciled themselves to a Romney candidacy because they see Romney as essentially a weak and passive president who will concede leadership to congressional conservatives:
All we have to do is replace Obama. ... We are not auditioning for fearless leader. We don't need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We know what direction to go. We want the Ryan budget. ... We just need a president to sign this stuff. We don't need someone to think it up or design it. The leadership now for the modern conservative movement for the next 20 years will be coming out of the House and the Senate.
The requirement for president?
Pick a Republican with enough working digits to handle a pen to become president of the United States. This is a change for Republicans: the House and Senate doing the work with the president signing bills. His job is to be captain of the team, to sign the legislation that has already been prepared.
(The quotes within the quote are from Grover Norquist, recently delivered to an adoring crowd at CPAC.)
Ah, Grover Norquist. Now, there. is. a. piece. of. work.
ReplyDeleteI was given Jack Abramoff's memoir as a kind of practical joke gift, and my jaw has dropped with every turned page. Norquist (college bud of Abramoff) is now, and has apparently always been, what they call "one white cat shy of a Bond villain." He not only has zero scruples about lying, cheating and stealing his way to any prize he desires, he absolutely glories in his ability and willingness to dive to the depths of any cesspit for his cause. This is the guy that gives pond scum such a bad name.