Cutting Through The Crap

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Damn Lies


Two years ago, in acknowledging that the US took prisoners to other countries for "questioning," George Bush said (I'm quoting from a NYT article that appeared 3/15):

“...the C.I.A. used an alternative set of procedures.” He added: “These procedures were designed to be safe, to comply with our laws, our Constitution and our treaty obligations. The Department of Justice reviewed the authorized methods extensively and determined them to be lawful.” (emphasis mine.)

The article is worth reading in full. Among the descriptions of "safe" and lawful procedures:

"I was taken out of my cell and one of the interrogators wrapped a towel around my neck; they then used it to swing me around and smash me repeatedly against the hard walls of the room.” The prisoner was then put in a coffin-like black box, about 4 feet by 3 feet and 6 feet high, “for what I think was about one and a half to two hours.” He added: The box was totally black on the inside as well as the outside.... They put a cloth or cover over the outside of the box to cut out the light and restrict my air supply. It was difficult to breathe. When I was let out of the box I saw that one of the walls of the room had been covered with plywood sheeting. From now on it was against this wall that I was then smashed with the towel around my neck. I think that the plywood was put there to provide some absorption of the impact of my body. The interrogators realized that smashing me against the hard wall would probably quickly result in physical injury.”

There's much more. It should also be said that the article is based on a comprehensive report by the International Red Cross, which conducted extensive interviews, and that the prisoners had had no contact with each other; in addition, they were told that the information would not be made public. That they described virtually the same things lends believability.

“They placed a cloth or cover over the box to cut out all light and restrict my air supply. As it was not high enough even to sit upright, I had to crouch down. It was very difficult because of my wounds. The stress on my legs held in this position meant my wounds both in the leg and stomach became very painful. I think this occurred about three months after my last operation. It was always cold in the room, but when the cover was placed over the box it made it hot and sweaty inside. The wound on my leg began to open and started to bleed. I don’t know how long I remained in the small box; I think I may have slept or maybe fainted."

The conclusion of the IRC report states:

“The allegations of ill treatment of the detainees indicate that, in many cases, the ill treatment to which they were subjected while held in the C.I.A. program, either singly or in combination, constituted torture. In addition, many other elements of the ill treatment, either singly or in combination, constituted cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.”

I know at least three of my readers are saying "So what?"

Let's leave aside the issue of whether torture is useful (because it's pretty clear it isn't) and whether we should be doing it (since it gives unreliable information and eliminates trying the prisoners in a court of law, we shouldn't). Let's just ask: did it serve US interests to have our president get up and lie, bald-faced, about such a thing as this? And what should we call a "Department of Justice" which ignores the law to serve up only what the president wants to hear? And finally, since by international agreement it's the International Red Cross that identifies instances of torture, what is the appropriate legal response? (Rhetorical question. We already know the answer, and we know nothing will happen.)

.

5 comments:

Frank Drackman said...

So Why's Git-Mo still Open??
HMMM?! HMMM?! HMMM?!??????
If you really believe the Spooks aren't still doin whatever it takes to find out what Mr Terrorist knows you're more Naive than even I thought you were...
They're Professionals Sidney, they don't tell you how to operate, you should repay the courtesy...

Frank

P.S. Is Git-Mo still open??

Sid Schwab said...

Frank, has there ever been a point you didn't miss? It's the spooks that are doing the good, as I just finished saying. It's the invasions and torturing and illegal detentions that aren't.

And how many times are you going to ask your Gitmo question? You've repeated it at least a hundred times. Do you read the news? Do you know what Obama said about it? Of course you do.

Beer Bottle said...

Here's the official Obama position:

"If I had a ticking bomb situation and obviously whatever was being used I felt was not sufficient, I would not hesitate to go to the president of the United States and request whatever additional authority I would need," Panetta told the senators.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/05/panetta.torture/index.html

Lots of leeway. But maybe you won't know, so you feel so bad when it happens.

Sid Schwab said...

Gee, BB, I guess you'd be surprised to learn that what another person says is not the same as what Obama (he's the one in charge, by the way) says. Like this.

You guys love that ticking time-bomb argument. Got any others? (Don't answer. I'll just have to spend more time refuting them.)

Beer Bottle said...

Hmmm...your liink Jan 5. Mine Feb 5. Maybe Obama's thinking has evolved in a month? If Panetta doesn't speak for Obama, then what is his job? Maybe he should be fired?

I think few emergent situations are the "ticking bomb" scenario. Capture one guy and ask him where his other guys are--maybe you're in a hurry? Maybe his guys may be getting close to your guys--in a bigger hurry?

I have a little closer info on this that I can't share. Torture isn't the best way to get info, certainly. But sometimes it's all you have.