Tuesday, September 21, 2010

The Message Is Medium (at best)

In the case of health-care reform, the Democrats have pretty clearly failed to communicate what their reforms are. It's frankly amazing that after a year-long health-care debate that dominated the mainstream media and blogosphere, many Americans don't seem to know that the Affordable Care Act bars insurers from discriminating on the basis of pre-existing conditions. But this isn't just a superficial public-relations issue for the Democrats. It's the product of a deeper malady affecting the party. Democrats seem to be unable to craft policies that deliver clear results in a fashion which voters can understand and vote on. That's because the policy-making process that takes place among Democratic legislators is so open to compromise, amendment, interest-group giveaways, and bank-shottery that the party's big programmes end up lacking coherence, not just in their details, but in their basic goals and values.

It's especially infuriating, because of information like this:

When voters who want to repeal the Democrats' health-care reforms find out that this would mean insurance companies could refuse coverage to people with pre-existing conditions, half of them don't want to repeal the reforms anymore.

Since I'll never stop saying it until it stops being true, I'll never stop saying it: Congressional Democrats could screw up and complicate saying hello. And it isn't just because they're out-messaged (although gods and goddesses know they are); it's for the reasons above. Their legislation, while hearted in the right place, is full of crap that ought not be there.

In the case of Rs, their legislation has been nearly universally wrong-headed and disastrous to our economy. But they manage to keep focused on their goal: if they want to screw everyone else if it's what it takes to further enrich themselves, they're sharp as assassins at doing it; and, witchcraftily, to achieve public buy-in.

Still, there most certainly is a messaging problem when there's good stuff in the D legislation, people don't know it, and they hate it; and when there's bad stuff in R legislation, people do know it, and they simply don't care.

Between incoherent and inarticulate Ds, and unconscionable and unscrupulous Rs, how will we ever survive?

1 comment:

  1. I'm not the brightest. Nor am I the dumbest. Wouldn't we hope that most people fall within those parameters?

    When I read comment after comment on a local news board that almost preen over the idea: I will NOT pay for anyone but myself! Health care is not a right, it is *something else*, to condense, it is something that, if you don't have a good job to pay for it, start saving for yourselves. Or find a real job!

    Remember Bush jr saying Churches will take over our lost ones?

    I am so sickened by the loss of ideals in the last half century. And hard-fought for rights. As a Democrat (and I need not be called a liberal, or a socialist )why does one have a problem with affording health care to all, and taking down the Pharmaceuticals and insurance companies? Such a still wealthy country, and we can't even consider national health care.

    Boggles the mind.



Comments back, moderated. Preference given for those who stay on topic.

Popular posts